Industry insiders call it the “build vs buy” dilemma. And it comes up time and time again with custom software, internal processes, and hiring decisions. Most founders go wrong when they ask the incorrect questions. They should be asking how long it will take and whether it will serve them long-term.
The attraction to “build it ourselves” sounds like the logical choice. No third-party vendors. No patchwork integration. No being answerable to other parties. There comes a time when that rationale becomes antiquated.
When should a startup stop building everything in-house? The answer is varied and depends on time and context.
When You Want to Concentrate on Your Product
The testing stages of product development can take manpower. Your early-stage team is extending their time into the early hours.
Right now, you need all hands on deck. Nobody has time to manage the day-to-day running of the business. And yet, bills must be paid. Onboarding must be done.
Outsource non-core work. Stop building utility tools like hosting or security patches. Your payment gateway, for instance, can be handed to an established vendor. PayPro Global recommends partnering with a platform that handles global payments, taxes, and regulations.
That way, your team can focus on shortening the lead time to get your product out.
Recommended reading: How to Create a HIPAA-Compliant Remote Patient Monitoring System
When ‘Don’t Architect for Fantasy Millions’ Sounds Good
Strategic catalyst Lior Weinstein argues that over-architecting for problems is the reason why he’s witnessed 31 dead startups with a combined burn of $12.5 million. Instead of plugging the issues staring them in the face, they chose to create solutions for problems that weren’t theirs to begin with.
“The CTO spends six months building ‘scalable architecture.’ They incinerate runway on AWS bills for empty servers. They finally launch to… tumbleweeds. Then they point fingers at ‘market conditions’ and shut down with beautiful, scalable architecture serving exactly zero humans.” – Lior Weinstein, via CIO.
He believes that building it yourself is a fundamental misunderstanding of what early-stage companies need to survive. If a project can be deployed, do it.
Recommended reading: Client Acquisition Strategies That Go Beyond Cold Email Campaigns
When You Want to Go Remote
Startups have the advantage of employing a global workforce. You are in the ideal position to hire the best talent from around the world. And you can do it all via a specialized employment agency.
Some agencies deal with contracts and onboarding and can act as an employer of record. Very NB if you’re hiring across borders.
Forbes reports that early global hiring is a superpower for high-growth startups. Cofounder of hiring platform Teamed, Tom Price-Daniel, tells the publication that companies are expanding into more than three countries within their first six to 12 months.
It makes business and money sense.
Recommended reading: How to Estimate Your Office Printing Needs Before Renting a Printer
When Maintenance Costs Feel Burdensome
Building integrated assets takes time, money, and continuous maintenance. Those demands can become a big investment.
APIs can change or be deprecated, and failing to keep up can leave integrations broken and customers frustrated.
Once again, these issues pull developers away from core projects. They disrupt their focus and slow progress. Leave the upkeep and compliance to people who are trained to maintain these systems.
Recommended reading: 7 Easy Steps to Make an Org Chart That Employees Understand
FAQs
When Should a Startup Stop Building Everything In-House?
A startup should consider outsourcing third-party solutions when non-core systems start taking time away from product development, growth, or customer experience.
What Is the Build vs. Buy Dilemma?
The build vs. buy dilemma is the decision between developing a tool or capability internally or using an existing third-party solution.
Why Can Building Everything In-House Become Expensive?
The initial development cost is only part of the equation. In-house systems also require ongoing updates, infrastructure, security, maintenance, and developer time.
What Should Startups Consider Outsourcing?
Startups can consider outsourcing functions that aren’t central to their competitive advantage. These might include payment processing, tax and compliance, infrastructure, security, payroll, recruitment administration, and other operational tasks.
Recommended reading: Supermetrics vs. Coupler.io: Which Data Integration Tool Is Better?
Startup Build vs. Buy: Stats to Know
| Stat | What it Tells Us |
|---|---|
| 31 startups | Lior Weinstein says he has witnessed 31 startups fail after collectively burning $12.5 million, highlighting the potential cost of solving problems before they exist. |
| 3+ countries | Forbes reports that some high-growth companies are expanding into more than three countries within their first six to 12 months. |
| 6 months | Weinstein cites an example of a CTO spending six months developing scalable architecture before the startup has established meaningful demand. |
| 6–12 months | The period in which some companies are reportedly expanding into multiple countries. |
Build or Buy?
You can brag to your fellow founders and say, “Yeah, we built that.” Or you could offer them honest advice and suggest they weigh all the options.
Sometimes, a product calls for moving everything in-house. Other times, outsourcing is as effective, with lower overheads.
But don’t take our word for it. Add up the numbers. Do the math. And don’t forget to ask, “Will this serve me long-term?”
